• save boissiere house
  • Top Posts

  • The World is Talking, Are You Listening?
  • a

  • Festival of the Trees
  • Scoutle

    Connect with me at Scoutle.com
  • Advertisements

Expelled – flop or success?

In its first weekend, the creationist propaganda film Expelled either was either hugely successful or a terrible flop, depending on how you look at things. As an “almost giddyChris Mooney pointed out, Expelled is the eighth-highest grossing political documentary in the US. It also had the second-highest opening weekend, bringing in $3,153,000. Sounds like a huge hit.

Or maybe it’s a flop. Brian Switek said considered it to be “on track to be a box-office bomb”.
Hemant Mehta compared Expelled‘s $1,130 per screen opening weekend with $12,601 per screen for Morgan Spurlock’s Supersize Me, $20,063 per screen for Michael Moore’s Roger and Me, and $70,332 per screen for Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. Nikki Finke’s made an important point:

So much for the conservative argument that people would flock to films not representing the “agenda of liberal Hollywood”.

So what is it – an success or a flop? What is the baseline against which you could declare it a success or a failure? Expelled is, as Mooney described it, “the eighth-highest grossing [political documentary] of all time”, but that doesn’t take into account the fact that it also had the largest opening for a political documentary (1,052 screens). The closest comparison was An Inconvenient Truth Farenheit 9/11, which opened on 868 screens and grossed $23,920,637 on its opening weekend. Only three other political documentaries have opened on more than 100 screens. Combine the number of screens upon which the movie opened with the campaign to pay kickbacks to Christian schools for bringing students to see the movie. Taking all this into consideration, it seems to me that the “revenue per screen” is a much better measure of the success of the movie than is the total gross revenue.

Update: Razib comes to a very similar conclusion.


4 Responses

  1. Something is wrong here. “An Inconvenient Truth” opened on four screens and took $367,311 on the opening weekend. I’m basing this on IMDB business details for the movie.

    I think you must have been meaning some other movie with an opening on 868 screens.

  2. Followup… I have found the movie you meant. It was Farenheit 9/11 that opened on 868 screens with revenue of $23.9 million.

  3. Thanks. Obviously I can’t read very well. 🙂

  4. I just saw the video. Might be interesting to know the revenue post-theater…But, I must digress…

    I am curious that the descriptive “creationist propaganda” term is used. This label is refuted in the documentary. Is this to suggest that these other documentaries are not propaganda? Not sure how to take the label.

    Ironically, the label suggests an anti-religion propaganda in that intelligent design must point to the God of the OT Creation narrative. Perhaps a fair term to describe this would be theophobic.

    I am curious as well to wonder what the kickbacks are to public schools or other organizations for showing An Inconvenient Truth? For example why not in the interest of open inquiry show both in the public school and let the student evaluate the data?

    We now know that Al Gore has misquoted and misrepresented facts. We also now know that the science of “man-made” global warming is not as “certain” as has been claimed. In fact effort has been made to manipulate and control the open debate…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: