• save boissiere house
  • Top Posts

  • The World is Talking, Are You Listening?
  • a

  • Festival of the Trees
  • Scoutle

    Connect with me at Scoutle.com
  • Advertisements

Omnivore’s Dilemma

The fast food industry wants to make you fat. Um, yeah, like that’s news to anyone. And after Morgan Spurlock‘s Super Size Me, we know that they want to kill us as well. But why? Sure, it’s good for any individual company to get us to eat more, and the way to suck us in is through overly large portions rich in salt, fat and sugar. But why?

I’m reading Michael Pollan‘s Omnivore’s Dilemma, and I think I am beginning to grasp an idea of why. The current production system rewards farmers who produce more corn, which depresses prices, which forces other farmers to grow more corn to maintain their current incomes, which reduces prices, which forces farmers to grow more corn… End result is an overproduction of corn – increasing from 4 billion bushels* in the 1970s to 10 billion* when Pollan wrote the book. For normal consumer good, higher prices drive down demand, lower prices drive it up. That isn’t generally true for food. When food prices are high, you still need food. When food prices are low, there’s a limit to how much food you can eat. Population growth in the US is around 1%*, which really isn’t an acceptable rate of growth for the food industry. There are two ways to raise income – increase food production, or convince people to pay more for their food.

It’s easy enough to see how companies convince people to pay more for food. People pay more for convenience, they pay more for organic, they pay more for all sorts of “premium” products. Sure, it’s a bit of a scam, but no more than most consumer goods. The other option, to get people to eat more, is far more disturbing. It has obviously worked – people are getting heavier and eating more. But the question of responsibility is more important. Can we really say that the food industry set out to get people to eat more as a tool for their economic growth? That I don’t know, that I can’t say. But the idea has its appeal.

*The numbers are from Pollan’s book – I haven’t verified them, but I don’t have any compelling reason to doubt him.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: