• save boissiere house
  • Top Posts

  • The World is Talking, Are You Listening?
  • a

  • Festival of the Trees
  • Scoutle

    Connect with me at Scoutle.com

Expelled for plagiarism

A few weeks ago, the producers of the creationist propaganda movie Expelled, stopped PZ Myers from entering a screening of the movie. They didn’t recognise PZ’s guest, Richard Dawkins, and Dawkins was allowed into the cinema. Afterwards, when PZ and Dawkins discussed the film, Dawkins referred to an animation that sounded a lot like the Harvard/XVIVO animation The Inner Life of a Cell, but clips available online showed that it wasn’t the same animation. And yet, it was remarkably similar.

Dembski had used the animation (stripped of its original narration and replaced with one with a creationist spin) in his talk at OU. Abbie recognised the animation, and set in motion a chain of events that resulted in a cease-and-desist letter being sent to Dembski. An examination of The Design of Life, Dembski’s update of the intelligent design “textbook” Of Pandas and People showed that images from the video appear to have been hurriedly removed from the book (as evinced by the fact that related footnotes and captions were not). Presumably this was done in response to the cease-and-desist letter.

Around this time, the release date for Expelled was pushed back from February to April. While it may have been unrelated, it’s possible that the producers of Expelled realised that the animation posed a problem, and they decided to replace it with another animation. Unfortunately, their copy is basically just that – a copy. And since it’s substantially the same, it’s likely that it is still a copyright infringement. As a result of that, Harvard/XVIVO have sent the producers of Expelled another cease-and-desist letter. They now have two options – re-edit the film, with just over a week to go until its release date, or proceed and run the risk of being sued.

Updates: Abbie has the latest developments; see I love the smell of roasted creationists in the morning and Anyone want seconds?

Update II: David Bolinsky, “the medical illustrator chiefly responsible for The Inner Life of the Cell outlines the process involved in the construction of the animation in an email that Richard Dawkins reposted. (Via Mike O’Risal)

Additional links (updated as I become aware of new material)

Note: A question that’s likely to arise is, since the producers of Expelled made their own version of The Inner Life of a Cell, how can you call it a copyright violation? The answer, in essence, is that the creative process that is protected by copyright includes things like composition and action sequences. As Jeh comments over at PT,

The story-boarding, modeling, rendering and endless tweaking of specific compositions is work-intensive and it requires considerable thought and discussion about how things should be depicted.

Copyright doesn’t cease to exist just because you tweak things a little.

About these ads

8 Responses

  1. I’m not sure “powerup” is a promoter. But the producers of Expelled are probably grateful for yours and mine promotion.

  2. Oh yea, you should see The smoking gun: Comment #81 and #83 for a more likely explanation of the PZ Myers gate crashing incident.

    That being said, given Glen Davidson’s comments at PT tonight, I expect the PT-mafia will turn on him rather quickly.

  3. You’re right, it was a bit ambiguous. I’m going to de-segregate the “other reactions”.

  4. More likely… or more embarrassing, given all the things other folks have pointed out in the comments?

  5. “A bit ambiguous”? /me is puzzled. How does summarizing, say, Denyse O’Leary in the following fashion count as promoting the film or excusing its producers’ actions?

    Even if XVIVO’s currently copyrighted work is the result of substantial monetary and research investments, being ripped-off by creationists is just part of life.

  6. What I had written was misleading, hence William Wallace’s first comment. “Ambiguous” wasn’t even the right wording – I thought a response was supportive of William Wallace, when in fact it wasn’t.

  7. [...] then, but beware what your children are told at school), then don’t bother. For more details, here or here and drift from these should introduce you to the [...]

  8. [...] read in 2006 … on Book: The Ice FindersS E E Quine on Who’s zoomin’…Expelled for plagiar… on They’re doing it ag…Expelled for plagiar… on [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: